Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Bercadik: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Seni is a peer-reviewed academic journal that publishes original research and scholarly works in the field of arts and creative practices.

The journal aims to provide a platform for the dissemination of knowledge, critical inquiry, and innovation in the arts, particularly within interdisciplinary and contemporary contexts.

The scope of the journal includes, but is not limited to:

  • Performing Arts (Dance, Music, Theatre)
  • Visual Arts and Design
  • Film and Media Studies
  • Artistic Research and Practice-Based Research
  • Cultural Studies and Ethnography in the Arts
  • Creative Processes and Artistic Methodologies

Bercadik prioritizes manuscripts that demonstrate:

  • Clear research problems and academic rigor
  • Strong theoretical or conceptual frameworks
  • Methodological clarity, including practice-based approaches
  • Significant contributions to the development of arts scholarship at national and international levels

The journal encourages submissions that:

  • Integrate theory and artistic practice
  • Explore local cultural contexts within global discourse
  • Contribute to interdisciplinary and cross-cultural understanding in the arts

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Review

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Editorial

Unchecked Open Submissions Unchecked Indexed Unchecked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

All submitted manuscripts undergo a double-blind peer review process. Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant field.

The review process includes an initial editorial screening to assess the manuscript’s suitability, originality, and compliance with the journal’s scope and guidelines. Manuscripts that pass this stage are sent for peer review.

Reviewers evaluate submissions based on originality, methodological rigor, clarity of presentation, and contribution to the field of arts and creative practices.

Based on reviewers’ recommendations, the editor will make one of the following decisions: accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject. The average review process takes approximately 4–8 weeks.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Publication Ethics

1. Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed journal is an essential contribution to the development of a coherent and respected body of knowledge. It reflects the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them.

Bercadik is committed to maintaining the highest standards of publication ethics and takes all possible measures against publication malpractice. This statement is based on the principles of Committee on Publication Ethics.

All parties involved in the publishing process—authors, editors, reviewers, and the publisher—are expected to adhere to the following ethical standards.

2. Duties of Authors

2.1 Reporting Standards

Authors must present an accurate and objective account of their research. The manuscript should contain sufficient detail and references to allow others to replicate or understand the work.

2.2 Originality and Plagiarism

Authors must ensure that their work is entirely original. Any use of other works must be properly cited. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

2.3 Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication

Authors should not submit the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently. Submitting the same research to multiple journals is unethical and unacceptable.

2.4 Authorship of the Manuscript

Authorship should be limited to those who have made significant contributions to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the study. All co-authors must approve the final version of the manuscript.

2.5 Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Authors must disclose any financial or non-financial conflicts of interest that may influence the results or interpretation of their work.

2.6 Acknowledgment of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite all publications that have influenced their research.

2.7 Errors in Published Works

When authors discover a significant error in their published work, they must promptly notify the editor and cooperate to correct or retract the paper.

2.8 Research Involving Human or Animal Subjects

If the research involves human or animal subjects, authors must ensure that ethical approval has been obtained and informed consent has been provided where necessary.

3. Duties of Editors

Editors are responsible for all editorial decisions and must ensure the integrity of the publication process.

Editors must:

  • Evaluate manuscripts based on academic merit without discrimination
  • Maintain confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
  • Avoid conflicts of interest
  • Ensure a fair and unbiased peer review process
  • Take appropriate action when ethical concerns are raised

4. Duties of Reviewers

Reviewers play a crucial role in maintaining the quality of published articles.

Reviewers must:

  • Provide objective and constructive feedback
  • Maintain confidentiality of manuscripts
  • Identify relevant work not cited by the authors
  • Inform the editor of any potential conflicts of interest
  • Decline review if unqualified or unable to review in a timely manner

5. Publication Decisions

The editor is responsible for deciding which manuscripts should be published, based on:

  • The importance and originality of the work
  • The validity of the research
  • Reviewer recommendations
  • Legal requirements (e.g., plagiarism, copyright)

6. Plagiarism Screening

All manuscripts submitted to Bercadik will be checked using plagiarism detection software such as Turnitin or iThenticate.

Manuscripts with a similarity index exceeding acceptable limits may be rejected.

7. Retraction and Correction Policy

If a published article is found to contain significant errors or ethical violations:

  • A correction will be issued for minor errors
  • A retraction will be issued for serious ethical violations or invalid findings

The journal will follow COPE guidelines in handling retractions and corrections.

8. Data Access and Retention

Authors may be asked to provide raw data related to their research for editorial review and should be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable period after publication.

9. Ethical Oversight

The editorial team is responsible for ensuring that all published content adheres to ethical standards. Any suspected misconduct will be investigated and handled in accordance with established guidelines.