Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

EDUCRAF adalah jurnal ilmiah yang diterbitkan oleh Program Studi Pendidikan Kriya, Fakultas Seni Rupa dan Desain, Institut Seni Indonesia Padangpanjang yang menyajikan artikel asli tentang:
1. Pendidikan Kriya
2. Kriya Seni
3. Seni Terapan
4. Desain Kriya
5. Industri Kreatif.
6. Bisnis Kriya

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Beberapa kebijakan dalam review Educraf
1. Setiap makalah yang dikirimkan akan ditinjau oleh peninjau.
2. Proses review menggunakan Double-blind Review, yaitu reviewer tidak mengetahui identitas penulis, dan penulis tidak mengetahui identitas reviewer.
3. Dalam proses review, reviewer mempertimbangkan judul, abstrak, pembahasan (temuan) dan kesimpulan. Selain itu, pengulas juga mempertimbangkan kebaruan, dampak ilmiah, dan referensi yang digunakan dalam makalah.
Tanggapan para peninjau akan menjadi dasar bagi Redaksi untuk menyimpulkan:
1. Terima Pengajuan
2. Wajib Revisi
3. Kirim ulang untuk ditinjau
4. Kirim ulang di tempat lain
5. Tolak Pengajuan
Sebuah artikel ditolak untuk diterbitkan karena berbagai pertimbangan, antara lain:
1.Artikel tidak sesuai dengan ruang jurnal.
2. Artikel tidak mengikuti kaidah penulisan karya ilmiah atau pedoman penulis.
3. metodologis yang mendasar.
4. Penulis menolak untuk memberikan saran perbaikan yang diberikan oleh resensi tanpa logistik dasar yang.
5. Terdapat indikasi plagiarisme lebih dari 15%.

 

Publication Frequency

Educraf diterbitkan dua kali setahun pada bulan Juli dan November.

 

Open Access Policy

Educraf menyediakan akses terbuka langsung ke semua artikel dengan prinsip membuat penelitian tersedia secara bebas untuk umum; mendukung pertukaran pengetahuan global yang lebih besar; dan cara yang sangat berharga untuk memaksimalkan visibilitas dan dampak penelitian, khususnya bidang pendidikan. 

Educraft menggunakan  CC-BY  atau  Lisensi Atribusi Creative Commons

Ini berarti :

  • Kebebasan untuk menggunakan dan melakukan pekerjaan;
  • Kebebasan untuk mempelajari karya dan menerapkan informasi;

 

Publication Etics

Educraf adalah jurnal peer-review yang diterbitkan oleh Prodi Pendidikan Kriya, Fakultas Seni Rupa dan Desain, Institut Seni Indonesia Padangpanjang dua kali setahun. Pernyataan ini menjelaskan etis semua pihak yang terlibat dalam tindakan penerbitan artikel di jurnal ini, termasuk penulis redaksi, Dewan Editorial, peer-reviewe dan penerbit. Pernyataan ini didasarkan pada Pedoman Praktik Terbaik COPE untuk Editor Jurnal.

Pedoman Etika Publikasi Jurnal

Publikasi artikel di Educraf yang ditinjau oleh rekan  sejawat  adalah blok bangunan penting dalam jaringan pengetahuan yang koheren dan pengembangan. Ini adalah cerminan langsung dari kualitas karya penulis dan lembaga yang mendukung mereka. Artikel peer-review mendukung dan mewujudkan metode ilmiah. Oleh karena itu penting untuk menyepakati standar perilaku etis yang diharapkan untuk semua pihak yang terlibat dalam tindakan penerbitan: penulis, editor jurnal, peer reviewer, penerbit dan masyarakat.  

ISI Padangpanjang as publisher of Educraf  takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the ISI Press Publisher and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication Decisions

The editor of the Educraf is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair Play

An editor at any time evaluated manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Pengungkapan dan Benturan Kepentingan

Semua penulis harus mengungkapkan dalam naskah mereka setiap konflik kepentingan atau substantif lainnya yang mungkin mempengaruhi hasil atau interpretasi naskah mereka. Semua sumber dukungan keuangan untuk proyek harus.

dasar dalam karya yang diterbitkan

Ketika seorang penulis menemukan kesalahan atau ketidakakuratan yang signifikan dalam buku yang diterbitkan, kewajiban penulis untuk segera memberi tahu editor jurnal atau penerbit dan bekerja sama dengan editor untuk menarik kembali atau memperbaiki makalah.

 ------------------------------

amrizal

Manajer Jurnal

 

plagiarism

Setiap makalah yang dikirimkan ke Educraft akan melalui pemeriksaan plagiarisme oleh Pemeriksa Plagiarisme